WebJefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 entered into an exclusive contract with Roux & Associates, a firm of anesthesiologists, and required that every patient undergoing … WebJefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2. v. Tying arrangements need only be condemned if they restrain competition on the merits by forcing purchases that would not otherwise be made. A lack of price or quality competition does not create this type of forcing. NCAA v.
Jefferson Parish and Its Progeny: More Efficient Health Care …
WebJefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 Respondent Hyde Docket no. 82-1031 Decided by Burger Court Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Citation 466 … WebJefferson Parish Hospital v. Hyde-The last chapter Not since Chalmers-Francis v. Nelson has a case received as much attention from nurse anesthetists as the Hyde case in which the AANA filed an amicus curiae brief. On March 26, 1984, the Su-preme Court of the United States issued its deci- byu football bowl projection
Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde - Wikipedia
WebJun 8, 1992 · See ante, at 10; Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U. S., at 13-14. A We must assume, for purposes of deciding this case, that petitioner is without market, much less monopoly, power in the interbrand markets for its micrographics and photocopying equipment. See ante, at 11-12, n. 10; Oklahoma City v. WebJefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U. S. 2 , 21-22 (1984). Evidence in the record indicates that service and parts have been sold separately in the past and still are sold separately to self-service equipment owners.5 Indeed, the development of the entire high-technology service industry is evidence of the efficiency of a ... WebJEFFERSON PARISH HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 2, et al., Petitioners. v. Edwin G. HYDE. No. 82-1031. Argued Nov. 2, 1983. Decided March 27, 1984. Syllabus. A hospital governed by … cloud computing revenue 2022