http://employmentlawbulletins.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Dewhurst-v-Revisecatch.pdf WebDewhurst v Revisecatch t/a Ecourier (UKET/2202409/2024) – Landmark judgment confirming that ‘limb (b) workers’ are protected under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. ... Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] AC 677- Supreme Court - Vicarious liability for assault of a customer. The …
Dewhurst v ReviseCatch - Home - employmentlawbulletins.com
WebDewhurst v Revisecatch Ltd (t/a Ecourier) (30 October 2024) Practical Law Case Page D-104-4971 (Approx. 1 page) Ask a question Dewhurst v Revisecatch Ltd (t/a Ecourier) … WebOct 26, 2024 · The case of Dewhurst v Revisecatch Ltd An Employment Tribunal Judgment given shorty before the pandemic in the case of Dewhurst v Revisecatch Ltd, held that TUPE applies to such workers. It is important to note that one key right of being unfairly dismissed if one is dismissed as the result of a TUPE transfer does not apply to … importance of curfew in the philippines
Six employment law cases that will shape 2024
WebNov 28, 2024 · The case concerned cycle couriers who claimed they automatically transferred from City Sprint to Revisecatch when the former lost and the latter won a … WebDewhurst v Revisecatch t/a Ecourier (UKET/2202409/2024) – Landmark judgment confirming that ‘limb (b) workers’ are protected under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. General Medical Council v Michalak [2024] ICR 49 – Led in the Supreme Court by William Edis QC of 1 Crown Office Row. The case ... WebIn Dewhurst v Revisecatch Ltd t/a Ecourier ET2202409/18, an employment tribunal held for the first time that workers qualify for protection under the Transfer of Undertakings … literacy textor